As humans, we all succumb to the act of aggression at some point in life. The said aggression might be the cause of a provocation, an act of defense, a reaction, or an inbound frustration (dissatisfaction). Yet, despite knowing that violence is the extreme form of anxiety we tend to bring forth our worst. Depreciating ourselves to the extent of a beast with no restraint. This behaviour is quite reflective of our incompetency, resultant of our failure to achieve a specific target. Thus bringing out a sense of incompetence while resorting to violence and intimidation.
That being said, I come to the closure of my three quotes challenge. I sincerely thank “She” for nominating me for this intriguing exercise, and I humbly urge the readers to visit her blog. She can be reached at- “This door is alarmed“.
As I embarked upon the three quotes challenge, I had originally opined on sharing quotes from the lives of three people viz. “Mahatma Gandhi, Albert Einstein and Isaac Asimov”. However, I decided to forego with the thought and pursued three renown quotes. Therewith spreading awareness on people giving unwarranted advice, and the notion that we cannot always blame ourselves for the wrong doings, believing that universe at times has its own plans.
In pursuance of which’ the incoherent human aggression caught my final line of thought. Although aggression is not always negative, however, the intimidating behaviour to force an idea down the throat of other people is a relative sign of incompetency. This might resultantly be due to lack of patience, paucity of knowledge, absence of wisdom and an obsession towards something. Thus bringing me to this final quote:
“Violence is the last refuge of the incompetence.”
– Isaac Asimov
In parlance of the aforesaid, there lays an emphasis between passion and obsession. When passion transforms into obsession, man loses his sense of rationality. Thus failing to differentiate between right and wrong, his conscience deflects while indulging in violence. His arrogance takes better of him and he starts seeking pleasure from the suffering of others. In process turning towards extremism and harming people in manners possible.
The incompetency of the said individual(s) is not limited to the absence of rationality and wisdom. Therefore on exhaustion of their available arsenal and failure to convince a people, he invariably submits to aggression and/or violence as a last resort. Whereas, a competent person avoids unnecessary use of aggression, owing to his ability to resolve a problem with his skills and intellect. However, a learned person would never succumb to his aggressive self, whether verbal, emotional or physical.
I do not intend to say that competency is bereft of aggression. One might reasonably be granted a liberty to defend himself from life-inflicting harm or danger, or to an extent preemptively act against an imminent danger, inter alia a person might be aggressive in his approach according to the need or the demand of a situation. But if the same aggression is performed with the intent of inflicting injury on someone or for imposition of one’s belief on someone then it requisites a serious introspection.
The implied corollary being that a person who resorts to violence must therefore be incompetent.
What do you believe?