GST is not merely a product of objective analysis. The national debate on its implementation is a case in point i.e. to be weighed upon a broader taxation policy perspective. The question at stake is the viability of taxation policy in the whole, which is a dire reflection of the economic policy, highly apprehended by the duties of a state.
As per reports, India’s present GDP- tax contribution is merely 18% which is miser in comparison to that of the developed nations i.e. 30%-40% and that of other developing economies i.e. 23%- 26% for Mexico, Brazil and South Africa resp. The total tax collected in India comprises of 2/3rd indirect tax and only 1/3rd direct tax, which is extremely unhealthy and direct opposite of the developed countries. It is with this perspective the coming of GST (Goods Sales Tax) was a good breather. With the bringing of automate trails and digitalisation, it has become a bit difficult for people to evade tax reforms and default in paying of the taxes. Secondly, with the coming of GST there has been a pull and push towards the registration and compliances of business units (inclusive of unregistered sellers), primarily due to the peculiar system of input tax credits.
However, notwithstanding the above, the decisions with respect to the tax rates have been disappointing. The issues of paramount confusion are laid down as follows:
- The GST rates in India are not just broken to four rates- 5, 12, 18 and 28 percent but in reality (as per reports) at least 7 different rates would be in operation. Thus defying the logic behind “one nation one tax” mechanism.
- Some absurdities includes the GST rate for Gold (3%) and Diamond (0.25%) which are fully imported items and are known for creating current account deficits. Whereas, daily essential items like sanitary pads/ sanitary napkins and medicines attract a GST rate of 18, 12 and 5 resp.
- Items such as petroleum, electricity and taxes on liquor have been kept away from the purview of GST. The country has seen a rise of 122 percent in the indirect tax collection from the petroleum sector. This is nothing but travesty of the implementation mechanism.
- The lack of reliable resources and facilities such as Internet access is another disturbance in the entire process. The data states that internet penetration in India is merely 32.8 percent, of which only 15% is from rural areas. Absence of a prepared infrastructure is a major obstacle to bringing up of rural businesses within the paradigm of GST.
- The absence of legal profession from the paradigm of GST is another issue to tackle in near future. According to government notification, all advocates and senior advocates have been exempted from the purview of registertion under GST.
- The absence of a clear instruction on availing the Input Tax Credit by “A” from State “X” over his services from State “Y” in the State “Z” is of concern i.e. SGST to CGST in trans-border transactions (services).
It is clear from the aforesaid that tax enforcement is also a matter of discovery and voluntary disclosure. The tax discovery in India has always been of avoidance rather than that of compliance. In the paradigm of forceful application of GST in the current behavioral model from non-compliance to compliance the issue of cultural shift has been overlooked.
In order to implement the GST successfully the government needs to have a clear understanding of the mass(es) requirements. There is a need to bring a shift in the social behavior wherein tax evasion would become a social stigma rather than be considered as a badge of smartness.